The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-10-s1-s11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Ferreira Maia, Sarah J Moore |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,030 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1010 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 172 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 136 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 12% |
| Researcher | 124 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 50 | 5% |
| Other | 156 | 15% |
| Unknown | 264 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 286 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 91 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 66 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 5% |
| Other | 200 | 19% |
| Unknown | 286 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#83,278
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4
of 6,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220
of 121,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.