You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Direct and indirect evidence of efficacy and safety of rapid exercise tests for exertional desaturation in Covid-19: a rapid systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01620-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asli Kalin, Babak Javid, Matthew Knight, Matt Inada-Kim, Trisha Greenhalgh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 37% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,306,278
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#188
of 2,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,528
of 431,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#9
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.