You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges of molecular nutrition research 6: the nutritional phenotype database to store, share and evaluate nutritional systems biology studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genes & Nutrition, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12263-010-0167-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben van Ommen, Jildau Bouwman, Lars O. Dragsted, Christian A. Drevon, Ruan Elliott, Philip de Groot, Jim Kaput, John C. Mathers, Michael Müller, Fre Pepping, Jahn Saito, Augustin Scalbert, Marijana Radonjic, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Anthony Travis, Suzan Wopereis, Chris T. Evelo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Slovakia | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,989,878
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#60
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,038
of 171,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.