You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of changing the measles vaccine vial size on Niger's vaccine supply chain: a computational model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-425 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tina-Marie Assi, Shawn T Brown, Ali Djibo, Bryan A Norman, Jayant Rajgopal, Joel S Welling, Sheng-I Chen, Rachel R Bailey, Souleymane Kone, Hailu Kenea, Diana L Connor, Angela R Wateska, Anirban Jana, Stephen R Wisniewski, Willem G Van Panhuis, Donald S Burke, Bruce Y Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 27% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,662,853
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,690
of 15,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,018
of 112,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#123
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.