You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use frequency of traditional Chinese medicine in Taiwan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-7-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fang-Pey Chen, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Yen-Ying Kung, Yu-Chun Chen, Li-Fang Chou, Fan-Jou Chen, Shinn-Jang Hwang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2011.
All research outputs
#3,364,233
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,562
of 7,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,776
of 76,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.