You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of powered prostheses on user perspectives, metabolics, and activity: a randomized crossover trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00842-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jay Kim, Jeffrey Wensman, Natalie Colabianchi, Deanna H. Gates |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 48 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,196,178
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#88
of 1,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,644
of 454,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#6
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.