You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Mobile phones and head tumours. The discrepancies in cause-effect relationships in the epidemiological studies - how do they arise?
Environmental Health, June 2011
Angelo G Levis, Nadia Minicuci, Paolo Ricci, Valerio Gennaro, Spiridione Garbisa
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||15||94%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||13||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||13||14%|
|Student > Master||9||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||7||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||31||34%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||6||7%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||4||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
of 1,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 116,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.