You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-7-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rob McCarney, James Warner, Steve Iliffe, Robbert van Haselen, Mark Griffin, Peter Fisher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,077 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 1% |
| United States | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1029 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 191 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 179 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 143 | 13% |
| Researcher | 126 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 59 | 5% |
| Other | 192 | 18% |
| Unknown | 187 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 283 | 26% |
| Psychology | 95 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 70 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 62 | 6% |
| Engineering | 59 | 5% |
| Other | 267 | 25% |
| Unknown | 241 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#589,569
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#44
of 2,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#872
of 79,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them