You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comprehensive evaluation of the impact of telemonitoring in patients with long-term conditions and social care needs: protocol for the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Bower, Martin Cartwright, Shashivadan P Hirani, James Barlow, Jane Hendy, Martin Knapp, Catherine Henderson, Anne Rogers, Caroline Sanders, Martin Bardsley, Adam Steventon, Raymond Fitzpatrick, Helen Doll, Stanton Newman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Canada | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 250 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 17% |
| Researcher | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 9% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,557,113
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#537
of 7,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,084
of 121,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#4
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.