You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does mass drug administration for the integrated treatment of neglected tropical diseases really work? Assessing evidence for the control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths in Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-9-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Parker, Tim Allen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 321 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 24% |
| Researcher | 48 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 18% |
| Unknown | 55 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,143,188
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,070
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,123
of 182,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.