You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Highly glycosylated MUC1 mediates high affinity L-selectin binding at the human endometrial surface
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-00793-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lewis W. Francis, Seydou N. Yao, Lydia C. Powell, Sean Griffiths, Alexander Berquand, Thomas Piasecki, William Howe, Andrea S. Gazze, Mary C. Farach-Carson, Pamela Constantinou, Daniel Carson, Lavinia Margarit, Deya Gonzalez, R. Steven Conlan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,647,369
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#300
of 1,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,100
of 420,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#12
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.