↓ Skip to main content

ENU-induced phenovariance in mice: inferences from 587 mutations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ENU-induced phenovariance in mice: inferences from 587 mutations
Published in
BMC Research Notes, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carrie N Arnold, Michael J Barnes, Michael Berger, Amanda L Blasius, Katharina Brandl, Ben Croker, Karine Crozat, Xin Du, Celine Eidenschenk, Philippe Georgel, Kasper Hoebe, Hua Huang, Zhengfan Jiang, Philippe Krebs, Diantha La Vine, Xiaohong Li, Stephen Lyon, Eva Marie Y Moresco, Anne R Murray, Daniel L Popkin, Sophie Rutschmann, Owen M Siggs, Nora G Smart, Lei Sun, Koichi Tabeta, Victoria Webster, Wataru Tomisato, Sungyong Won, Yu Xia, Nengming Xiao, Bruce Beutler

Abstract

We present a compendium of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced mouse mutations, identified in our laboratory over a period of 10 years either on the basis of phenotype or whole genome and/or whole exome sequencing, and archived in the Mutagenetix database. Our purpose is threefold: 1) to formally describe many point mutations, including those that were not previously disclosed in peer-reviewed publications; 2) to assess the characteristics of these mutations; and 3) to estimate the likelihood that a missense mutation induced by ENU will create a detectable phenotype.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Professor 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 12%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,969,997
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#248
of 4,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,065
of 183,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.