You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HIV-1 infected monozygotic twins: a tale of two outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-11-62 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loubna Tazi, Hiromi Imamichi, Steven Hirschfeld, Julia A Metcalf, Susan Orsega, Marcos Pérez-Losada, David Posada, H Clifford Lane, Keith A Crandall |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 26% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,842,060
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#444
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,401
of 119,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.