You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sialic acid-engineered mesoporous polydopamine dual loaded with ferritin gene and SPIO for achieving endogenous and exogenous synergistic T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of HCC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-00821-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kai Fan, Chengying Lu, Gaofeng Shu, Xiu-Ling Lv, Enqi Qiao, Nannan Zhang, Minjiang Chen, Jingjing Song, Fazong Wu, Zhongwei Zhao, Xiaoling Xu, Min Xu, Chunmiao Chen, Weibin Yang, Jihong Sun, Yongzhong Du, Jiansong Ji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
Materials Science | 1 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,329,446
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#615
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,304
of 456,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#28
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.