You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Forkhead box (FOX) G1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma epithelial-Mesenchymal transition by activating Wnt signal through forming T-cell factor-4/Betacatenin/FOXG1 complex
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13046-021-01900-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xingrong Zheng, Jiaxin Lin, Hewei Wu, Zhishuo Mo, Yunwen Lian, Peipei Wang, Zhaoxia Hu, Zhiliang Gao, Liang Peng, Chan Xie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#874
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,396
of 466,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#31
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.