↓ Skip to main content

Repeatability of selective laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repeatability of selective laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12886-016-0299-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A. Francis, Nils Loewen, Bryan Hong, Laurie Dustin, Kevin Kaplowitz, Robert Kinast, Jason Bacharach, Sunita Radhakrishnan, Andrew Iwach, Lidiya Rudavska, Parul Ichhpujani, L. Jay Katz

Abstract

To analyze the results of repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). participants with primary or secondary open-angle glaucoma (excluding uveitic) who had undergone SLT 360° (SLT 1) with diminution of response over time followed by repeat SLT 360° (SLT 2). Six months of follow-up were required and at least 6 months in between SLT 1 and 2. The main outcome measures were IOP reduction at 6 and 12 months and a comparison of the response between SLT 1 and 2. One hundred thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. If only one eye had repeat treatment, that eye was chosen; if both eyes qualified, one was chosen at random. The baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) for SLT 1 = 20.3+/- 5.2 mmHg and SLT 2 = 19.4 +/- 5.0 was reduced to 16.4 +/- 3.9 and 16.7 +/- 4.7 at 1 year, respectively (p < .001). Medication use was not significantly changed, and was 2.2 +/- 1.2 at baseline for SLT 1 and 2.1 +/- 1.3 for SLT 2, and at 1 year was 1.9 +/- 1.3 and 2.2 +/- 1.2, respectively. A subanalysis of 62 patients matched for equivalent baselines showed a baseline IOP = 18.7 +/- 3.8 for SLT 1 and 18.7 +/- 3.5 for SLT 2, reduced to 16.0 +/- 4.3 and 15.3 +/- 3.8 at 1 year (p < .001). Repeat SLT laser (360-degree treatment, followed by a loss of effect over time, then a second 360-degree treatment) in this population resulted in IOP lowering similar to that of the initial treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 18 31%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 67%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#2,278
of 2,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,793
of 370,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,554 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.