↓ Skip to main content

Difference in the relative biological effectiveness and DNA damage repair processes in response to proton beam therapy according to the positions of the spread out Bragg peak

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Difference in the relative biological effectiveness and DNA damage repair processes in response to proton beam therapy according to the positions of the spread out Bragg peak
Published in
Radiation Oncology, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13014-017-0849-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hidehiro Hojo, Takeshi Dohmae, Kenji Hotta, Ryosuke Kohno, Atsushi Motegi, Atsushi Yagishita, Hideki Makinoshima, Katsuya Tsuchihara, Tetsuo Akimoto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 18%
Physics and Astronomy 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,649,446
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#433
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,285
of 314,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.