You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Difference in the relative biological effectiveness and DNA damage repair processes in response to proton beam therapy according to the positions of the spread out Bragg peak
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiation Oncology, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13014-017-0849-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hidehiro Hojo, Takeshi Dohmae, Kenji Hotta, Ryosuke Kohno, Atsushi Motegi, Atsushi Yagishita, Hideki Makinoshima, Katsuya Tsuchihara, Tetsuo Akimoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 28% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 18% |
Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,649,446
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#433
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,285
of 314,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.