You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards Robot Scientists for autonomous scientific discovery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Automated Experimentation, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1759-4499-2-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Sparkes, Wayne Aubrey, Emma Byrne, Amanda Clare, Muhammed N Khan, Maria Liakata, Magdalena Markham, Jem Rowland, Larisa N Soldatova, Kenneth E Whelan, Michael Young, Ross D King |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 24% |
| Brazil | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Belarus | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 209 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 24% |
| Researcher | 43 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 41 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 15% |
| Engineering | 29 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#772,480
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Automated Experimentation
#1
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,754
of 173,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Automated Experimentation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them