You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis and Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars—Japan Scar Workshop Consensus Document 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Burns & Trauma, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41038-019-0175-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rei Ogawa, Sadanori Akita, Satoshi Akaishi, Noriko Aramaki-Hattori, Teruyuki Dohi, Toshihiko Hayashi, Kazuo Kishi, Taro Kono, Hajime Matsumura, Gan Muneuchi, Naoki Murao, Munetomo Nagao, Keisuke Okabe, Fumiaki Shimizu, Mamiko Tosa, Yasuyoshi Tosa, Satoko Yamawaki, Shinichi Ansai, Norihisa Inazu, Toshiko Kamo, Reiko Kazki, Shigehiko Kuribayashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 87 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 91 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,789,981
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Burns & Trauma
#32
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,485
of 482,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns & Trauma
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.