You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A realist evaluation of a collaborative model to support research co-production in long-term care settings in England: the ExCHANGE protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-021-00257-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Wilkinson, J. Day, J. Thompson-Coon, V. Goodwin, K. Liabo, G. Coxon, G. Cox, C. Marriott, I. A. Lang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 42% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 9 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,107,968
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#188
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,939
of 455,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.