↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the signaling endosome hypothesis: Why a drive to the nucleus is better than a (random) walk

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 284)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the signaling endosome hypothesis: Why a drive to the nucleus is better than a (random) walk
Published in
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, October 2005
DOI 10.1186/1742-4682-2-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles L Howe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Hungary 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Taiwan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 56 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,389,039
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#48
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,468
of 59,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them