You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Traditional food taboos and practices during pregnancy, postpartum recovery, and infant care of Zulu women in northern KwaZulu-Natal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-021-00451-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mmbulaheni Ramulondi, Helene de Wet, Nontuthuko Rosemary Ntuli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Zambia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 325 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Researcher | 22 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 171 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 173 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#15,776,552
of 24,049,457 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#514
of 758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,569
of 426,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,049,457 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.