↓ Skip to main content

Tibial cutting guide (resector) holding pins position and subsequent risks of periprosthetic fracture in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tibial cutting guide (resector) holding pins position and subsequent risks of periprosthetic fracture in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis study
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13018-021-02308-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elvis Chun-sing Chui, Lawrence Chun-man Lau, Carson Ka-bon Kwok, Jonathan Patrick Ng, Yuk-wah Hung, Patrick Shu-hang Yung, Jason Chi-ho Fan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Engineering 4 17%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,331,648
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#310
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,672
of 427,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#23
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.