You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservative treatment of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: results of an Italian multi-institutional retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-7-177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristiana Vidali, Orazio Caffo, Cynthia Aristei, Filippo Bertoni, Alberto Bonetta, Marina Guenzi, Cinzia Iotti, Maria Cristina Leonardi, Salvatore Mussari, Stefano Neri, Nicoletta Pietta |
| Abstract |
The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased markedly in recent decades. In the past, mastectomy was the primary treatment for patients with DCIS, but as with invasive cancer, breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy (RT) has become the standard approach. We present the final results of a multi-institutional retrospective study of an Italian Radiation Oncology Group for the study of conservative treatment of DCIS, characterized by a very long period of accrual, from February 1985 to March 2000, and a median follow-up longer than 11 years. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 44% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,670,096
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,272
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,584
of 183,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.