↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eudald Illa, Daniel J Sargent, Elena Lopez Girona, Jill Bushakra, Alessandro Cestaro, Ross Crowhurst, Massimo Pindo, Antonio Cabrera, Esther van der Knaap, Amy Iezzoni, Susan Gardiner, Riccardo Velasco, Pere Arús, David Chagné, Michela Troggio

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 79%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2011.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,489
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,839
of 192,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#38
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.