↓ Skip to main content

Screening for coeliac disease in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: myths, facts and controversy

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for coeliac disease in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: myths, facts and controversy
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13098-016-0166-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sjoerd F. Bakker, Maarten E. Tushuizen, Boudewina M. E. von Blomberg, Hetty J. Bontkes, Chris J. Mulder, Suat Simsek

Abstract

This review aims at summarizing the present knowledge on the clinical consequences of concomitant coeliac disease (CD) in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The cause of the increased prevalence of CD in T1DM patients is a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Current screening guidelines for CD in adult T1DM patients are not uniform. Based on the current evidence of effects of CD on bone mineral density, diabetic complications, quality of life, morbidity and mortality in patients with T1DM, we advise periodic screening for CD in adult T1DM patients to prevent delay in CD diagnosis and subsequent CD and/or T1DM related complications.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 23%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,058,961
of 8,155,605 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#247
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,679
of 257,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,155,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.