↓ Skip to main content

Scar extent evaluated by late gadolinium enhancement CMR: a powerful predictor of long term appropriate ICD therapy in patients with coronary artery disease

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scar extent evaluated by late gadolinium enhancement CMR: a powerful predictor of long term appropriate ICD therapy in patients with coronary artery disease
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joachim Alexandre, Eric Saloux, Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué, Alain Lebon, Adrien Lemaitre, Vincent Roule, Fabien Labombarda, Nicole Provost, Sophie Gomes, Patrice Scanu, Paul Milliez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Other 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 50%
Engineering 5 7%
Mathematics 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#717
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,079
of 295,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.