↓ Skip to main content

Effects of in ovo electroporation on endogenous gene expression: genome-wide analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neural Development, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of in ovo electroporation on endogenous gene expression: genome-wide analysis
Published in
Neural Development, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1749-8104-6-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma K Farley, Emily Gale, David Chambers, Meng Li

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 25%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2011.
All research outputs
#11,256,373
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#121
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,058
of 189,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them