You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of in ovo electroporation on endogenous gene expression: genome-wide analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neural Development, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8104-6-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma K Farley, Emily Gale, David Chambers, Meng Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#141
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,663
of 121,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.