You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional analysis of human and chimpanzee promoters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2005-6-7-r57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian Heissig, Johannes Krause, Jaroslaw Bryk, Philipp Khaitovich, Wolfgang Enard, Svante Pääbo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
| Professor | 7 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2011.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,558
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,518
of 67,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.