You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-based guidelines for use of probiotics in preterm neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-92 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Girish C Deshpande, Shripada C Rao, Anthony D Keil, Sanjay K Patole |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 16% |
| Researcher | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 53 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,787,763
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,721
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,803
of 121,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.