You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acceptance of shared decision making with reference to an electronic library of decision aids (arriba-lib) and its association to decision making in patients: an evaluation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-70 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver Hirsch, Heidemarie Keller, Tanja Krones, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 31% |
| Psychology | 17 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,674,939
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,565
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,135
of 117,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.