↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of once-daily aclidinium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of once-daily aclidinium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-12-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul W Jones, Stephen I Rennard, Alvar Agusti, Pascal Chanez, Helgo Magnussen, Leonardo Fabbri, James F Donohue, Eric D Bateman, Nicholas J Gross, Rosa Lamarca, Cynthia Caracta, Esther Garcia Gil

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 104 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Other 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#961
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,364
of 246,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#29
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.