↓ Skip to main content

Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: Design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: Design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Barnett, Aine McConnon, Jean Kennedy, Monique Raats, Richard Shepherd, Wim Verbeke, Jon Fletcher, Margôt Kuttschreuter, Luisa Lima, Josephine Wills, Patrick Wall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 9 6%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 7%
Psychology 10 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2011.
All research outputs
#18,795,369
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,127
of 15,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,159
of 111,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#168
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.