You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of a MF-59™-adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine to prevent 2009 A/H1N1 influenza-related hospitalisation; a matched case-control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anneke Steens, Eleonora G Wijnans, Jeanne P Dieleman, Miriam CJM Sturkenboom, Marianne AB van der Sande, Wim van der Hoek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uzbekistan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2012.
All research outputs
#6,446,440
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,002
of 7,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,881
of 120,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#14
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.