You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing services for Early Infant Diagnosis (EID) of HIV: a comparative descriptive analysis of national programs in four countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-553 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anirban Chatterjee, Sangeeta Tripathi, Robert Gass, Ndapewa Hamunime, Sok Panha, Charles Kiyaga, Abdoulaye Wade, Matthew Barnhart, Chewe Luo, Rene Ekpini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 33% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,205,705
of 23,504,998 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,527
of 15,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,036
of 118,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#94
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.