You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative analysis of methods for detecting interacting loci
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Chen, Guoqiang Yu, Carl D Langefeld, David J Miller, Richard T Guy, Jayaram Raghuram, Xiguo Yuan, David M Herrington, Yue Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 55 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 36% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,131,716
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,266
of 10,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,892
of 117,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#23
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.