↓ Skip to main content

Reusable tourniquets. An underestimated means for patient transfer of multi-resistant bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Proceedings, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reusable tourniquets. An underestimated means for patient transfer of multi-resistant bacteria
Published in
BMC Proceedings, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1753-6561-5-s6-p38
Authors

T Gottlieb, T Phan, EYL Cheong, G Sala, S Siarakas, A Pinto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2011.
All research outputs
#13,502,020
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Proceedings
#167
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,859
of 116,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Proceedings
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.