You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial of knowledge translation strategies to support evidence-informed decision-making in local governments (The KT4LG study)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Waters, Rebecca Armstrong, Boyd Swinburn, Laurence Moore, Maureen Dobbins, Laurie Anderson, Mark Petticrew, Rachel Clark, Rebecca Conning, Marj Moodie, Robert Carter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2012.
All research outputs
#13,740,846
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,763
of 15,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,979
of 183,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#87
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.