You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Personal genome testing: Test characteristics to clarify the discourse on ethical, legal and societal issues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-12-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eline M Bunnik, Maartje HN Schermer, A Cecile JW Janssens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2011.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#866
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,775
of 130,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.