You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rakesh Aggarwal, Nikhil Gupte, Nancy Kass, Holly Taylor, Joseph Ali, Anant Bhan, Amita Aggarwal, Stephen D Sisson, Sukon Kanchanaraksa, Jane McKenzie-White, John McGready, Paolo Miotti, Robert C Bollinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 35 | 28% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,259,175
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,944
of 3,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,201
of 115,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.