↓ Skip to main content

Use of the evidence base in substance abuse treatment programs for American Indians and Alaska natives: pursuing quality in the crucible of practice and policy

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of the evidence base in substance abuse treatment programs for American Indians and Alaska natives: pursuing quality in the crucible of practice and policy
Published in
Implementation Science, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas K Novins, Gregory A Aarons, Sarah G Conti, Dennis Dahlke, Raymond Daw, Alexandra Fickenscher, Candace Fleming, Craig Love, Kathleen Masis, Paul Spicer, the Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health's Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory Board

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Psychology 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2011.
All research outputs
#20,950,527
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,737
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,976
of 117,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.