You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative comparison and reproducibility of pathologist scoring and digital image analysis of estrogen receptor β2 immunohistochemistry in prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13000-016-0511-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony E. Rizzardi, Xiaotun Zhang, Rachel Isaksson Vogel, Suzanne Kolb, Milan S. Geybels, Yuet-Kin Leung, Jonathan C. Henriksen, Shuk-Mei Ho, Julianna Kwak, Janet L. Stanford, Stephen C. Schmechel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 38% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2016.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#819
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,100
of 371,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.