↓ Skip to main content

Gene-expression profile comparisons distinguish seven organs of maize

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene-expression profile comparisons distinguish seven organs of maize
Published in
Genome Biology, August 2002
DOI 10.1186/gb-2002-3-9-research0045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yangrae Cho, John Fernandes, Soo-Hwan Kim, Virginia Walbot

Abstract

A maize array was fabricated with 5,376 unique expressed sequence tag (EST) clones sequenced from 4-day-old roots, immature ears and adult organ cDNA libraries. To elucidate organ relationships, relative mRNA levels were quantified by hybridization with embryos, three maize vegetative organs (leaf blades, leaf sheaths and roots) from multiple developmental stages, husk leaves and two types of floral organs (immature ears and silks). Clustering analyses of the hybridization data suggest that maize utilizes both the PEPCK and NADP-ME C(4) photosynthetic routes as genes in these pathways are co-regulated. Husk RNA has a gene-expression profile more similar to floral organs than to vegetative leaves. Only 7% of the genes were highly organ specific, showing over a fourfold difference in at least one of 12 comparisons and 37% showed a two- to fourfold difference. The majority of genes were expressed in diverse organs with little difference in transcript levels. Cross-hybridization among closely related genes within multigene families could obscure tissue specificity. As a first step in elucidating individual gene-expression patterns, we show that 45-nucleotide oligo probes produce signal intensities and signal ratios comparable to PCR probes on the same matrix. Gene-expression profile studies with cDNA microarrays provide a new molecular tool for defining plant organs and their relationships and for discovering new biological processes in silico. cDNA microarrays are insufficient for differentiating recently duplicated genes. Gene-specific oligo probes printed along with cDNA probes can query individual gene-expression profiles and gene families simultaneously.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 4%
Mexico 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 46 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 37%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 14%
Professor 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Engineering 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2002.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,093
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,412
of 48,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.