↓ Skip to main content

Threshold protocol for the exchange of confidential medical data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Threshold protocol for the exchange of confidential medical data
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-2-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jules J Berman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Computer Science 2 14%
Psychology 2 14%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2002.
All research outputs
#15,675,797
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,545
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,295
of 51,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.