You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Retrospective assessment of at-risk myocardium in reperfused acute myocardial infarction patients using contrast‐enhanced balanced steady‐state free‐precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3T with SPECT validation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00730-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zheng Sun, Qiuhang Zhang, Huan Zhao, Chengxi Yan, Hsin-Jung Yang, Debiao Li, Kuncheng Li, Zhi Liu, Qi Yang, Rohan Dharmakumar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 46% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,386,735
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#948
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,516
of 457,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#22
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.