You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of standard occupational therapy versus early enhanced occupation-based therapy in a medical/surgical intensive care unit: study protocol for a single site feasibility trial (EFFORT-ICU)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-021-00795-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Rapolthy-Beck, Jennifer Fleming, Merrill Turpin, Kellie Sosnowski, Simone Dullaway, Hayden White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 58 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,627,847
of 25,492,047 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#60
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,696
of 454,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#4
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,492,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.