↓ Skip to main content

Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-7-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

France Légaré, David Moher, Glyn Elwyn, Annie LeBlanc, Karine Gravel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 156 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 56 33%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 34%
Psychology 25 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 20 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,319,742
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,562
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,904
of 72,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.