↓ Skip to main content

Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-7-30
Authors

France Légaré, David Moher, Glyn Elwyn, Annie LeBlanc, Karine Gravel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 145 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 51 32%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 34%
Psychology 24 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Social Sciences 18 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 18 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2012.
All research outputs
#3,162,118
of 4,505,285 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#660
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,047
of 81,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#36
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.