You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caudwell Xtreme Everest: a field study of human adaptation to hypoxia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc5921 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mike Grocott, Alan Richardson, Hugh Montgomery, Monty Mythen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 29% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,327,963
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,438
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,743
of 76,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.