↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Evaluation of a surgical service in the chronic phase of a refugee camp: an example from the Thai-Myanmar border

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Evaluation of a surgical service in the chronic phase of a refugee camp: an example from the Thai-Myanmar border
Published in
Conflict and Health, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13031-016-0092-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chathika K. Weerasuriya, Saw Oo Tan, Lykourgos Christos Alexakis, Aung Kaung Set, Marcus J. Rijken, Paul Martyn, François Nosten, Rose McGready

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/1752-1505-6-5.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,336,685
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#565
of 573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,204
of 366,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.